Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      23 Jul 2001 14:21:18 +0200
From:      Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil ecalloc.c emalloc.3 emalloc.c erealloc.c estrdup.c Makefile libutil.h
Message-ID:  <5l66cjx2dd.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:43:05 %2B0200"
References:  <28513.995870585@critter>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes:
> Why not simply use:
> 
> 	           char *_malloc_options = "X";
> 
> as documented in malloc(3) ?

Because it's not portable.  If you want to build FreeBSD code on other
platforms (such as I believe both Brian and Garance wanted to) you
cannot rely on their malloc having that option.  You can have your
code call non-portabel functions (such as strdup, snprintf, asprintf,
err, emalloc, and what have you) if you build a portabel library with
these functions for use on platforms where they aren't provided to
you.

/assar

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5l66cjx2dd.fsf>