From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 14 11:02:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA25367 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from covina.lightside.com (covina.lightside.com [198.81.209.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA25361 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:02:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by covina.lightside.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0txIH7-0004ImC; Thu, 14 Mar 96 11:01 PST Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:01:21 -0800 (PST) From: Jake Hamby To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: "Eric L. Hernes" , Poul-Henning Kamp , Brandon Gillespie , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new malloc/libc... In-Reply-To: <8060.826787337@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 13 Mar 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > A week or so ago I spoke with the guys at Xinside, they were > > holding their release of Motif because of a memory leak with malloc, > > the code ran fine with BSDi and Linux, but had a leak with FreeBSD. > > Is this phkmalloc or the original malloc which apparently is in 2.1 > > I thought phkmalloc was mainstream months ago, but maybe not. > > Sigh.. I still can't get a straight story on this one, and am > beginning to give up all hope of ever seeing Motif from X Inside. > I've sent phkmalloc to several people there, but they've never > clarified for me whether or not it had any effect. > > Jordan You can also remind them that gnumalloc comes with FreeBSD 2.1.0, and should have the same characteristics as Linux's malloc. Most X programs that use Imakefiles are linked with -lgnumalloc anyway now.. ---Jake