From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 4 11:46:22 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA19673 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 11:46:22 -0700 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA19663 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 11:46:13 -0700 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA06820; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 12:49:30 -0600 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 12:49:30 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199504041849.MAA06820@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Steven G Kargl "new install(1) utility" (Apr 4, 11:27am) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Steven G Kargl , freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: new install(1) utility Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > (2) -t -- Preserve the timestamp of the source file on target file. Is the check done within install to see if the source file is the same as the target file? If we are going to be pulling out information on the original file, it seems to be the best solution to do the check inside install. I would also make the Makefiles more clean. :-) > The timestamp feature may be useful in keeping things (such as includes) > in sync. If it does the work for us I think it could be very useful. Nate