Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:18:42 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Pawel Tyll <ptyll@nitronet.pl> Cc: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPFW eXtended tables [Was: Re: IPFW tables, dummynet and IPv6] Message-ID: <AA3C6FCC-0817-4108-A107-3367A6F14757@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <1413850829.20111225184712@nitronet.pl> References: <1674097252.20111218125051@nitronet.pl> <4EEDD566.8020609@FreeBSD.org> <20111220163355.GA87584@DataIX.net> <4EF73A4A.3050902@FreeBSD.org> <1413850829.20111225184712@nitronet.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25. Dec 2011, at 17:47 , Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
>> Changes:
>> * Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
> Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MAX can now be safely set to arbitrarily
> high number that would allow flexible numbering of tables? Arbitrarily
> high being 0xFFFFFFFF or some other nice large number that won't step
> on my ideas :)
which also gets us to the point that the man page need to be updated along
with the same changes and I cannot see that as part of the diff.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AA3C6FCC-0817-4108-A107-3367A6F14757>