Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:22:56 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Subject: Re: OpenSSH, PAM and kerberos Message-ID: <8661uiujin.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <226539732.20130903154908@serebryakov.spb.ru> (Lev Serebryakov's message of "Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:49:08 %2B0400") References: <86sixrwdcv.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130830131455.GW3796@zxy.spb.ru> <8661uj9lc6.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130902181754.GD3796@zxy.spb.ru> <867geywdfc.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130903083301.GF3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86y57euu8y.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130903093756.GG3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86ppsqutw7.fsf@nine.des.no> <998724759.20130903142637@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20130903103922.GI3796@zxy.spb.ru> <6110257289.20130903145034@serebryakov.spb.ru> <86d2oquopo.fsf@nine.des.no> <226539732.20130903154908@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Why do we need separate daemon for it? Why it could not be built-in > to sshd itself? sshd is just one of many applications in the system. > One more daemon -- one more point of failure... Or you can look at it the other way around: less copy-pasting between applications and far fewer chances to screw it up. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8661uiujin.fsf>