From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 14 21:10:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA13268 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:10:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA13263 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA00450; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:10:01 -0800 To: uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org (Frank Durda IV) cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is "immutable" supposed to be a good idea? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:51:00 +0700." Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:10:01 -0800 Message-ID: <448.824361001@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Of course, /stand/rm would not work to get rid of these files, chflags > wasn't around anymore (and it probably relies on the shared libraries anyway Actually, chflags is compiled deliberately static and could have been used to extricate yourself from this mess had it not been nuked. The strongest argument I've heard in all of the rest of this posting is one for a viable fixit floppy! :-) Jordan