From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 02:29:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F9D16A407 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 02:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B8843CA5 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 02:29:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF411A3C20 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C1A4514EE; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:29:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:29:26 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20061203022926.GA9253@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Update on X11BASE status X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 02:29:46 -0000 --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete X11BASE compliance. http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-maintainer.html We're now down to fewer than 110 ports that need to be corrected to deal with a non-standard X11BASE location (the rest are more general port problems). By now only 17 of those broken ports are unmaintained, so the majority of them are waiting on individual maintainers to step up and/or approve fixes already submitted by other users. Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that hold us up?! You know who you are since you've already received email about this, so let's push on and see how quickly we can get that number down to 50! Kris --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFcjaGWry0BWjoQKURAvw1AJwJ54YarfWDdaICqoxikpNdO00m/ACeNRoi 2tL+cwLT8DoJT5Au2RU1CUQ= =mlyf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--