From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 23:55:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE2816A492; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA4013C45E; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBLNcusM095613; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:38:56 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBLNcuU1095612; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:38:56 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:38:55 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Robert Watson , current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20061221233855.GA95581@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Robert Watson , current@FreeBSD.org References: <20061216055903.GA2712@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216111656.GA7501@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216112117.P72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216114426.GA7735@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216120746.E72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216125136.GA1094@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216125419.J72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061217153914.GA30048@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061217153914.GA30048@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: sysv_ipc.c broken in v1.30 (was Re: sysvshm appearse broken in -current) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:55:22 -0000 On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:39:14PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:00:56PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > As I said, this is something that I hope to revisit in the next few days. > > However, it would be helpful if you could tell me the arguments and call > > path to the ipcperm() function instance that's generating the improper > > failure. It could be that both a bug in ipcperm() and a big in shmget() > > This is kernel debug running test from t-shm.c which fails (from root). Is > it what you need? > > acc_mode 0x1b0 > owner > obj_mode 0x9b0 > dac_granted 0x1180 > priv_granted 0x0 > EACCES Any reaction? -- http://ache.pp.ru/