From owner-freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Tue Nov 28 19:19:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC56DEBF32 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E3274606 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A261FDEBF2F; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: xfce@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A201BDEBF2E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F01674605 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vASJJqXZ089431 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: xfce@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 202192] [PATCH] x11-fm/thunar 1.6.11 change file permissions on sshfs mounted files/dirs Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: madpilot@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfce@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:19:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D202192 --- Comment #7 from Guido Falsi --- (In reply to rozhuk.im from comment #6) > (In reply to Guido Falsi from comment #5) >=20 > https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D12863 > year+ - no activity in upstream, is there are life? This is irrelevant and in fact against your interest to point this out. If a patch is not accepted upstream maybe there are reasons for that. Also the fact the patch is not accepted upstream, even if accepting without question it to be good, is no reason to push it in FreeBSD. It could add unexpected effects. It will also make updating the port more difficult. The patched code could = be modified upstream and the patch need reconciliation, or changes upstream can cause the patch to break. >=20 > Yes, our port does not have GIO option, I do tests by add to makefile GIO > option and uncheck it. So the GIO case is irrelevant to our ports tree. No need to diverge to fix a problem that cannot happen. >=20 >=20 > I dont know what I need to do with upstream, they do not react on bug tac= ker. >=20 While I understand your frustration I have no connection with the upstream. If you get your code accepted by upstream that is proof of a minimum qualit= y of the change and also will mean thee code will anyway get in the ports tree, = so there is no reason to hold the change. If you cannot some FreeBSD committer needs to test check and make a decisio= n, this takes time. This is a volunteer project and no one is paid for it or working full time on port bugs. Things may require time. Please give me time to evaluate your code properly. This is a "port" of the upstream code not original code. Any divergence nee= ds a good motivation. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=