From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Jul 27 10: 6:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4CD37B403
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from arr@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (arr@localhost)
	by fledge.watson.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id f6RH6DL63496;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:06:13 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from arr@watson.org)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:06:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>
To: kris@obsecurity.org
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: inetd.conf -- IPv6 telnet
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010727130429.63491A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-security.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-security>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-security>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

kris,

just wondering about this thing i just noticed in 4-stable that telnet
comes default running under IPv6 in inetd.conf.  not sure how likely
someone would exploit over IPv6, but i was wondering about consistancy in
relation to what's being done already for IPv4?

Andrew

*-------------.................................................
| Andrew R. Reiter 
| arr@fledge.watson.org
| "It requires a very unusual mind
|   to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message