From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 12:41:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9487D16A4E2 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 12:41:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AFE043FDD for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 12:41:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 42574 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2003 20:41:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 9 Nov 2003 20:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3FAEA62F.4060907@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 13:40:15 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Guibert de Bruet References: <20031109034742.L10120@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <20031109034742.L10120@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Typos in -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 20:41:01 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 20:41:01 -0000 Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > Hi, > > The Online Merriam-Webster dictionary (m-w.com) doesn't have an entry for > the word 'recognised', yet it features throughout our source tree > (Including manpages). > > The following was run on CURRENT as of a few hours ago: > > bling# grep -R recognised /usr/src/ | wc -l > 155 > bling# grep -R recognized /usr/src/ | wc -l > 1898 > > This isn't a color/colour type of thing... > > Regards, > > >>Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > >>Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ > > www.m-w.com does indeed have a listing for 'recognise' and notes that it is a variant of 'recognize'. Appending a 'd' to the end of both words is valid and denotes past tense. As we have gone over many, many times in the past, we recognise no preference in British vs American spellings in our source tree and man pages. Scott