Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Dec 2013 19:26:35 +0100
From:      Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Position independent code and global destructor order (devel/ice)
Message-ID:  <20131206192635.53ce70ae@bsd64.grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131206032111.GH59496@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <20130626231741.497f7a9b@bsd64.grem.de> <20130626212833.GB91021@kib.kiev.ua> <20130627015602.7a437aad@bsd64.grem.de> <51CC411C.4060105@FreeBSD.org> <20130627140428.GI91021@kib.kiev.ua> <20130827144507.385a552c@bsd64.grem.de> <20131130223427.3d95ae7c@bsd64.grem.de> <20131205170728.GF59496@kib.kiev.ua> <20131205182058.5479b1ff@bsd64.grem.de> <20131206032552.59672a5b@bsd64.grem.de> <20131206032111.GH59496@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 05:21:11 +0200
Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:25:52AM +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > I tested your patch on 10-BETA2 and 10-BETA3. I built our complete
> > production environment from scratch, ran a huge number of unit and
> > integration tests. Everything works as expected, including Ice's
> > "Schwarz Counter" implementation
> > (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/More_C%2B%2B_Idioms/Nifty_Counter).
> > 
> > So as far as I can tell this fixes the problem, while still
> > accomplishing the goals of r211706.
> 
> Great, thank you.
> 
> I think that the patch can be further simplified.  From what I
> understand about __cxa_finalize(3) protocol, confirmed by LSB,
> __cxa_finalize(NULL) must only be called at the process exit, once.
> Than, libc can use the call as an indication of the final call to
> finalize, avoiding need for help from rtld.
> 
> Please test the patch below.  It is enough to rebuild libc only.
> 

Looks good and very clean.

I tested it on a build host using the same procedure as yesterday and
additionally by copying libc.so.7 to a fresh 10-BETA3 installation
and just checking the difference between "./runTests" (breaks) and
"LD_PRELOAD=/path/to/alternative/libc.so.7 ./runTests" (works).

Nice :)

-- 
Michael Gmelin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131206192635.53ce70ae>