From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 14:02:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998D516A4CF; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9256E43D31; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:02:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004032422021901500ro3c9e>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:02:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA66276; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:05:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:05:40 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <20040324135211.T88409@qbhto.arg> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" cc: "cvs-src@FreeBSD.org" cc: "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c cp X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:02:24 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:27:26PM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > des 2004/03/23 14:27:26 PST > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > usr.bin Makefile > > > Removed files: > > > usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c AsyncIO.h Makefile Makefile.dos > > ... > > > Log: > > > Remove doscmd from the base system now that it lives in the ports tree. > > > > Did you *really* have consensus for this?? Several committers said it > > worked fine and some said they'd like it to remain in /usr/src. > > My recollection of the discussion was something like this: > > 1. Can we remove doscmd from the base and make it a port? > 2. NO! doscmd works and I use it! > 3. But we can easily make doscmd a port. > 4. Oh, well, ok, but maybe we should wait till 6.0? > 5. At this point, tjr assented to waiting, but others mentioned that if > we're going to do it, let's do it before 5.3 so that 5-stable looks more > like what we want it to look. > 6. I heard no objections to 5. > > My perspective on this might be skewed, since I vote for its removal to > ports, sooner rather than later, as well. > I think most people heard "tjr assented to waiting" as the end of the discussion. remember emails can get re-orderred.. > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > >