Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:22:29 +0300 (MSK)
From:      Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To:        maxes@peterlink.ru
Cc:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DEVICE_POLLING and kern.hz
Message-ID:  <20021119162112.L67111-100000@woozle.rinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.40.0211182350420.10812-100000@buratino.peterlink.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 maxes@peterlink.ru wrote:

> > root@gw-f:~# ifconfig fxp1 link0
> > fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec  bundle_max: 0
> > root@gw-f:~# ifconfig fxp2 link0
> > fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec  bundle_max: 0
> >
> > But -- Does not seem to reduce either interrupt count (and possibly it should
> > not :) or interrupt percentage level...
> >
> > Maybe I should also say that all of them are in promiscuous mode due to
> > arpwatches...
> Hi.
> Check this (may be obsolete) document:
> http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/fxp/

[snip]

> What show "sysctl  -a | grep fxp" ?

hw.fxp_rnr: 0
hw.fxp0.int_delay: 500
hw.fxp0.bundle_max: 6
hw.fxp1.int_delay: 500
hw.fxp1.bundle_max: 6
hw.fxp2.int_delay: 500
hw.fxp2.bundle_max: 6
hw.fxp3.int_delay: 500
hw.fxp3.bundle_max: 6

(this is after tweaking int_delay, surely)

>  DEVICE_POLLING not support in SMP, do You know this  ?

N/A for my env -- it's rather small celeron ;-)


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                   [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021119162112.L67111-100000>