Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 20:31:55 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile Message-ID: <199505130331.UAA00925@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <9505130428.AA28066@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> (jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I did not this to fix a problem. There is already an EXEC_DEPENDS in * the makefile. It seemed more logical to have the list in the same * order as the order in which ports will be build. Oh, I see. Well, if there is already an EXEC_DEPENDS in the Makefile, I don't see any reason why you want to put things in non-alphabetical order in the parent Makefile. It doesn't fix anything, and it will just make it harder to find it. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505130331.UAA00925>