From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jun  5 15:14: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2A05A37B6F0; Mon,  5 Jun 2000 15:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmah@cisco.com)
Received: (from bmah@localhost)
	by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id e55MDdp73687;
	Mon, 5 Jun 2000 15:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmah)
Message-Id: <200006052213.e55MDdp73687@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1+ 05/08/2000
To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@cisco.com>, Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, leeym@bsd.ce.ntu.edu.tw
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/benchmarks Makefile ports/benchmarks/tmetric Makefile ports/benchmarks/tmetric/files md5 ports/benchmarks/tmetric/patches patch-aa ports/benchmarks/tmetric/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST 
In-reply-to: <20000605171801.L7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com> 
References: <200006051325.GAA48200@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006052041.e55KfMG42359@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20000605171801.L7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
   message dated "Mon, 05 Jun 2000 17:18:01 -0400."
From: bmah@cisco.com (Bruce A. Mah)
Reply-To: bmah@cisco.com
X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5<Pi&akO)o^8;[r
 %l(8ZHlbF`dD>v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A
 2V%N&+
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:13:38 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

If memory serves me right, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > Ummm.  The DESCR says that this program is "inspired by the (closed
> > source) pathchar utility".  Both Van Jacobson's original pathchar and my
> > open-source version pchar are both in the net category.  So for
> > consistency's sake, shouldn't tmetric really go into net also?
> 
> See benchmarks/netperf, et al.
> 
> Is there a double-standard going on here?

I don't know, honestly.  If there is, it isn't clear to me who's 
benefitting from it.  :-p

Bruce.






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message