Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:23:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226850] [pf] Matching but failed rules block without return Message-ID: <bug-226850-17777-tzpUbjqjKo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226850-17777@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226850-17777@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226850 --- Comment #5 from Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to vegeta from comment #4) Okay, I think I understand. It certainly makes sense to follow the block policy for this. If we're aiming for symmetry with the block rules, I'd say we need both: follow the block policy unless overruled per-rule by the pass blockspec. While I'm giving you work it'd be awesome to have a test case for this too. CURRENT now has test (based on VIMAGE) for some pf features, and I'd like many more tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226850-17777-tzpUbjqjKo>