Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:11:31 -0800
From:      Beech Rintoul <beech@alaskaparadise.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu>, jekillen <jekillen@prodigy.net>
Subject:   Re: dual boot; Linux, FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <200606101911.58033.beech@alaskaparadise.com>
In-Reply-To: <200606110244.k5B2iaqX015057@clunix.cl.msu.edu>
References:  <200606110244.k5B2iaqX015057@clunix.cl.msu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2135113.yea9k8xBy6
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 10 June 2006 18:44, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > ---- much excised ---
> >
> > > Anyway, this all works just fine.  The MBR and initial boot record in
> > > the boot sector of each slice (or primary partition if you must degra=
de
> > > to MS terminology) have just enough standardization that the FreeBSD
> > > MBR or most any of the other more fancy ones, can initiate the boot f=
or
> > > any of the OS-en commonly available to run on these machines.   Since
> > > the OS specific stuff really comes after it gets in to the slice boot
> > > record code in the boot sector, then generally any of them can boot a=
ny
> > > of them. The exception is MS MBRs.  I have heard that some more recent
> > > ones play better, but any I have had so far will not boot any slice
> > > except one for a MS OS.   I don't know what they screw up, but find it
> > > not surprisin=3D
> >
> > g.
> >
> > > So, there is the tome.
> > > All newbies, careful what you ask.  Someone may answer thusly with mo=
re
> > > than you every wanted to know.
> > >
> > > ////jerry
> >
> > Maybe this ought to be included in the handbook. I've seen this question
> > or one like it 100's of times on these lists. That was the best answer
> > I've seen.
> > Just my $.02
>
> Thanks for the positive comment.
> It glosses over stuff a little and isn't precisely correct in all detail,
> but I think it generally is correct and represents the way things work
> for all practical matters.
>
> Maybe it can be a FAQ.   How do they get there?
>
> ////jerry
>
> > Beech

I'd ask that question on the freebsd-doc@freebsd.org list. I've never=20
submitted anything to any of the docs, so I have no clue what their procedu=
re=20
is.

Beech
=2D-=20

=2D------------------------------------------------------------------------=
=2D-------------
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Alaska Paradise
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \  - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
=2D------------------------------------------------------------------------=
=2D-------------












--nextPart2135113.yea9k8xBy6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEi4n9p5D0B1NlT4URAvLAAJ9LmBDWSPP2+brQampEkO8Xp9nxygCfXVeE
vLcn8Y2tBzKuWOWwuWq+g2M=
=Q73Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2135113.yea9k8xBy6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606101911.58033.beech>