From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 19: 9:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245E637B487 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0CC23285; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id AD5479F2BD; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:11:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:15:02 +0100 From: Cejka Rudolf To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-Id: <20020212021159.AD5479F2BD@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garance A Drosihn wrote (2002/02/06): > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > seeing for performance when they run current. There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled in -current. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message