Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:57:35 -0600 From: "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> To: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@freebsd.org>, "Ed Maste" <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r359168 - head Message-ID: <69a9072f-6592-4eb5-8e63-92255adee0d9@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200324214552.GD1292@FreeBSD.org> References: <202003201602.02KG2kKW065294@repo.freebsd.org> <20200324214552.GD1292@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 04:02:46PM +0000, Ed Maste wrote: > E> Author: emaste > E> Date: Fri Mar 20 16:02:45 2020 > E> New Revision: 359168 > E> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/359168 > E> > E> Log: > E> remove ancient pre-2000 ObsoleteFiles.inc entries > E> > E> We support 10.3 as the minimum version to install from, which was > E> released in the mid-2010s. There's a lot of ancient ObsoleteFiles.inc > E> history that serves no purpose today; start by removing entries from > E> 1999 and earlier. > > I understand that rationale is to speedup 'make delete-old' times, and > trimming the default file definitely makes sense. However, what about > keeping the full ObsoleteFiles.inc version, at least for documenting > purposes? > This is what SCM history is for, IMHO. The historical entries serve little purpose outside of that. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69a9072f-6592-4eb5-8e63-92255adee0d9>