From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 24 03:15:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FA616A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 03:15:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCB743D2D for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 03:15:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sellis@d154-20-93-49.bchsia.telus.net) Received: from d154-20-93-49.bchsia.telus.net ([154.20.93.49]) by priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP <20050124031557.IZLF21687.priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net@d154-20-93-49.bchsia.telus.net>; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:15:57 -0700 Received: from d154-20-93-49.bchsia.telus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j0O3FZ9I096997; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:15:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sellis@d154-20-93-49.bchsia.telus.net) Received: (from sellis@localhost)j0O3FOdq096996; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:15:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sellis) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:15:24 -0800 From: Sean Ellis To: bitHawk Message-ID: <20050124031524.GG92435@telus.net> Mail-Followup-To: bitHawk , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050124003641.GD92435@telus.net> <00cd01c501bf$88f36140$0201a8c0@ebhhome> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00cd01c501bf$88f36140$0201a8c0@ebhhome> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade software with no package db X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sellis@telus.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 03:15:58 -0000 On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:50:51AM +0300, bitHawk wrote: Hey, > > 1. run the cvsup to update your port collection. > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html) > The updated port should already contain patching information and will take no problems here > care of the rest. So do not worry about dependencies. is that right? I hadn't looked into it yet, but I'd imagined that the system would use the db of installed stuff to verify whether some of the dependency stuff was present or not. Right now pkg_info gives me this, sellis@www:/home/sellis/backups> pkg_info ffsrecov-0.5 Recover files from a corrupt FFS ( on the one hand, a reminder of the screw-up that obliterated the db, on the other, as you can see, we're paying more attention to backups ; ) thanks, -- Sean