From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sat Oct 31 10:51:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34DAA22080 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB37B1799 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:51:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A29722427 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:45:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1446288345; bh=e3U3pmaO9NvjjKBXBWPGwibv2qcwqREmB2zq2Hspk00=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=J+mOBb0AtO6M8kqSxd6Uw8i8qDpwpH5jnwv+ALvRhiLvxukUGJ3zwiBB+q0GDHOVt rpzzDGUZqwYIwCFIXJJ3bXIA52+ABovQLDASaN5vN47yzoR5iTlaChm6XXo0gULjLl nvJCYmqg78EmGm3KLyXRQAsK+y9eYwFv7tFY9aMA= To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org From: abi Subject: wine and WoW64 subsystem Message-ID: <56349BD8.7070404@abinet.ru> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:45:44 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:51:49 -0000 Hi! The fourth 2014 FreeBSD status report mentions Wine improvements. https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Wine/FreeBSD Now we have 2 wine subsets - one for pure 32-bit code, another is for 64-bit. As far as I understand, we must choose what version we want to use (port is installing files in the same location error), also, a lot of installers for 64-bit programs are, in fact, 32 bit with 64-bit capable system check, so we can't run it in 32-bit prefix (this program requires 64-bit OS error from the installer) and we can't run it in 64-bit prefix (without WoW64, execution of 32-bit code in 64-bit prefix is not possible at all). So, looks like WoW64 subsystem can be handy to remove the situation with 2 separate wines and with installers. Are any known progress in porting of it ? abi.