From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 13:13:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1035) id 4D0AE16A4CF; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:13:17 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:13:17 +0000 From: Xin LI To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20050214131317.GA92604@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200502140542.j1E5g62l077236@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050214072648.GA51832@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050214072648.GA51832@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:13:17 -0000 On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:26:48AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:42:06AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > X> delphij 2005-02-14 05:42:06 UTC > X> > X> FreeBSD src repository > X> > X> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5) > X> sys/net if.c > X> Log: > X> MFC 1.218+1.219: > X> > > Is it going to be put into RELENG_5_3? This is up to security-officer@'s decision. A remote user can exploit some daemon's buffer overflow or other vulnerabilities to cause system to panic, while this is not totally FreeBSD's fault :-) So my suggestion is "Yes, we should have this go to RELENG_5_3", but again, I believe so@ has much more experience than I have, so let's hear what he will say. Cheers,