From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 10 18: 6:21 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id E58DD37B401; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:06:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:06:19 -0600 From: Juli Mallett To: Craig Rodrigues Cc: Wesley Morgan , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions Message-ID: <20030210200619.A23718@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030211020303.GA37644@attbi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030211020303.GA37644@attbi.com>; from rodrigc@attbi.com on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:03:03PM -0500 Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Alternate-Addresses: , , , , X-Towel: Yes X-LiveJournal: flata, jmallett X-Negacore: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * De: Craig Rodrigues [ Data: 2003-02-10 ] [ Subjecte: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions ] > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:44:33PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > that are supposedly fixed with 3.2.2... My question is, should I consider > > rebuilding my ports with this new compiler because of stability and/or > > speed improvements? Or is this point release not worth the effort. > > Speed improvements? No. gcc 3.2.2 is definitely slower than gcc 2.95. > There is a lot of arguing on the gcc mailing list right now about this, > but no concrete action to improve the situation yet. I would assume the OP meant relative to the previous version of GCC in tree. Current hasn't been 2.95.x for some time. -- Juli Mallett AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message