From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug  4  0:21:15 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1775414DF7
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  4 Aug 1999 00:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA06729;
	Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:05:18 +0200."
             <199908040705.JAA76327@gratis.grondar.za> 
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:19:44 -0700
Message-ID: <6725.933751184@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I am pro.
> 
> It takes a root compromise to use it anyway, and its usefulness
> for DHCP and rarpd is too compelling.
> 
> Perhaps the comments in the GENERIC file could be updated.

Well, given that I've gotten primarily positive support for this I
guess it's time to do it.  Warner, do you want to commit a securelevel
hack before I throw the switch in GENERIC?

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message