From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 06:36:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA69916A41C; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:36:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A19943D45; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:36:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6I6amd5010952; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:36:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id j6I6amvP010951; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:36:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:36:48 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Walery Kokarev Message-ID: <20050717233648.A10929@xorpc.icir.org> References: <001c01c58a17$5dbe4a40$0100000a@R3B> <200507161740.38234.max@love2party.net> <20050716095353.B86993@xorpc.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from w65l76@gmail.com on Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:34:56AM +0000 Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Traffic quota features in IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:36:49 -0000 On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:34:56AM +0000, Walery Kokarev wrote: > And why can't one use divert(4) interface? It looks quite suitable for > that particular task. no _that_ would really be a performance killer!