From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 3 16:36:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54680106566B for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C608FC20 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DB134803; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:36:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-76-26-198-188.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [76.26.198.188]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5089C1A852; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:36:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LJ9Ue-0003iI-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 11:36:56 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:36:56 -0500 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20090103163656.GA14189@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list , Stewart Flood Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 11:35:28 up 236 days, 17:58, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Cc: Stewart Flood Subject: Converting RRD records X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:36:58 -0000 I just built a replacement machne. it's 7.1 and AMD64. I have existing RRD records from an older I386 machine, that I would like to be able to access on this machine. Is it possible to convert these records, and if so how? -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.