From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 5 16:33:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E2872E; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [176.9.45.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339341FB; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from core.vx.sk (localhost [127.0.0.2]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C9D3643A; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:32:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.vx.sk Received: from mail.vx.sk by core.vx.sk (amavisd-new, unix socket) with LMTP id 7EzwkIVhWlDX; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:32:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.9.8.1] (chello085216226145.chello.sk [85.216.226.145]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 026ED36431; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:32:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <515EFCB5.1060703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:32:53 +0200 From: Martin Matuska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT References: <5159EF29.6000503@FreeBSD.org> <515B4CFA.9080706@FreeBSD.org> <9bc083a21a73839a0932514ea4f48d0d@webmail.lerctr.org> <515EFBD8.50900@FreeBSD.org> <62827019d058b2a905a0d476565b56c0@webmail.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <62827019d058b2a905a0d476565b56c0@webmail.lerctr.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:33:01 -0000 This is a patch against -CURRENT, so the receiving side in your case. On 5.4.2013 18:31, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2013-04-05 11:29, Martin Matuska wrote: >> You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem. >> We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos, >> maybe I will commit this preliminary (or final) fix to head. > > Which side does this need to be on? > > (sending? (since it's dmu_send)? > > (which in my case is 8-STABLE) -- Martin Matuska FreeBSD committer http://blog.vx.sk