From owner-freebsd-security Thu Feb 26 05:28:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA18041 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 05:28:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dworkin.amber.org (mail@dworkin.amber.org [209.31.146.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA18002 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 05:28:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petrilli@dworkin.amber.org) Received: (from mail@localhost) by dworkin.amber.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA28420; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 08:27:30 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: dworkin.amber.org: mail set sender to using -f Received: from dworkin.amber.org(209.31.146.74) by dworkin.amber.org via smap (V1.3) id sma028418; Thu Feb 26 08:27:06 1998 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 08:27:06 -0500 (EST) From: "Christopher G. Petrilli" To: Niall Smart cc: Nicolas Pondemer , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Thanks, but... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Niall Smart wrote: > Not "anyone", no. At least not to my knowledge. > > The system administrator of any SMTP host involved could of course > do this, but that would be Unethical with a capital U. As with any system with a single "deity" account, this will always be a problem.... you have to trust your administrators inplicitly, as there's no way to stop them from doing whatever they want... Like I said, this is aproblem with ALL single-level security mechanisms. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@amber.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message