From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 9 14: 6:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461AC37B41D for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g49L6VN24388; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:06:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49L6Sr70314; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:06:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 15:06:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020509.150607.03868204.imp@village.org> To: freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <3CD9727B.B53067A4@mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: Ian writes: : : > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad". : : Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and : differing opinions exist. However, there are standards that state explicitly that this is a rule, not an opinion, for some large classes of interfaces. Those tend to trump personal opinions. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message