Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Mar 2024 11:06:51 +0300
From:      Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,  dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 020281bef16d - main - archivers/fastjar: remove undue deprecation of maintained port
Message-ID:  <CALH631ns%2Bwp5gmR8c0mahc5JOVDJ2KRPgqmkbxbwhbjNKR5LYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <202403300538.42U5c9Fc039162@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
References:  <202403300538.42U5c9Fc039162@gitrepo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 8:38=E2=80=AFAM Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org=
> wrote:
>
> The branch main has been updated by danfe:
>
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3D020281bef16d866a64bac358=
50f21ae27f956b5c
>
> commit 020281bef16d866a64bac35850f21ae27f956b5c
> Author:     Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
> AuthorDate: 2024-03-30 05:36:18 +0000
> Commit:     Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
> CommitDate: 2024-03-30 05:36:18 +0000
>
>     archivers/fastjar: remove undue deprecation of maintained port

It is my personal opinion, but I think that one should assume
maintainership when undeprecating a port (especially maintained by a
group)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631ns%2Bwp5gmR8c0mahc5JOVDJ2KRPgqmkbxbwhbjNKR5LYQ>