From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 20 19:19:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B423C14F62; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 19:19:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA65250; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:19:00 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma065244; Tue, 21 Dec 99 14:18:50 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA20868; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:18:50 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:18:50 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: FibreChannel, FC-Al and NetApp. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is anyone using FC, FC-AL or NetApp filers on a FreeBSD 3.x-STABLE system? I'm very interested in some real world comparisons of the various technologies. Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message