From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 23 09:25:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA06782 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA06773 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA21168; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT) To: Paul Richards cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Curio In-reply-to: Your message of "23 Aug 1996 13:43:41 BST." <57wwyq2ruq.fsf@elsevier.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:23:15 -0700 Message-ID: <21166.840817395@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Doing the make depend and then the build as we traverse the tree makes > sense (I think) but don't fold it into the "all" target or you'll get > a make depend done everytime, which isn't really desirable. Not at all. The depend target switches off the .depend file and, except for a few broken cases which have been in the tree for ages and should be fixed anyway, doesn't happen twice in a row without an intervening cleandir. Jordan