Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:31:52 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <201206201231.52725.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200645290.71030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <201206201140.31525.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200645290.71030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wednesday 20 June 2012 11:46:20 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> How about leaving politics and getting back to technical grounds? > > > > what is the problem as long as gcc is in the ports tree? > > what is a problem as clang is in the ports tree? for the port? It does not make a difference. > > the problem is that these compilers are not 100% compatible and soon if > clang will be default it will be not just easy to build freebsd with gcc. For the kernel? How old is the gcc which comes with the kernel? Why are newer versions not in the base system? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206201231.52725.erichfreebsdlist>