Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:37:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 194223] sysutils/boxbackup staging support and compilation correction on FreeBSD 10
Message-ID:  <bug-194223-13-5x6oE9r01e@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-194223-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-194223-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194223

--- Comment #3 from Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> ---
If you use boxbackup then it's simpler than you may think. When new versions
are available you just need to update the PORTVERSION, run make makesum, and
submit a PR to get the updated port committed. Being a boxbackup user will
allow you to work with feedback better, but it's not a requirement to be a user
of the port to maintain it.

https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/ has all of the
information you need.

If you ever have questions ports@ or #bsdports on EFNet IRC can help.

Maybe you could give it a try? Given the last release was a few years ago it is
likely not going to require much attention. It's just that if I re-add it
without a maintainer someone else will come along and remove it again. It's our
policy to have someone adopt the port to help the workload.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194223-13-5x6oE9r01e>