From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Mar 1 19:21: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from smtp04.primenet.com (smtp04.primenet.com [206.165.6.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A1137B718 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:21:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert@usr05.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp04.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA29509; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:15:17 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr05.primenet.com(206.165.6.205) via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAuBaaG5; Thu Mar 1 20:15:07 2001 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA17730; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:20:38 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200103020320.UAA17730@usr05.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Arch question for a UDF FS driver To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 03:20:38 +0000 (GMT) Cc: dcs@newsguy.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200103011649.LAA01350@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Mar 01, 2001 11:49:47 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >And as have been answered before, that POSIX requirement is not viable > >with some modern distributed filesystems. > > Too bad, since it's not going to be changed. So, we going to go back to using "long" instead of "off_t" in some of the fd using system calls? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message