From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 06:59:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E8416A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 06:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72A143D53 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 06:59:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so961007wra for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:59:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=o2YMWEf0TBMr2l4Qi5+apneCbI9U+MIPNnyPlnBDdkw1+iQvlqhYh9QUxB9S2h7e4b/oGu1AsX/FQ3QTwBNMGtfSRi6eP1RFCNC49FyV5Ann2vTRGEL5zu27ynSzokIyVI0jFhYUWf3/f+3ZMHs6X4TDFvoWgLNwP1bz8F2hJng= Received: by 10.54.111.11 with SMTP id j11mr4069064wrc; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.144.11 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:59:06 +0200 From: Claus Guttesen To: performance@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3@FreeBSD.org> <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit> Cc: gnn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing... X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 06:59:09 -0000 > > > I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some > > > feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we > > > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy. > > I ran them on my dual Xeon @ 2.4 GHz, but it appears that rather than doing it's calculations in a timely manner it's been inspired by the world championship in athletics in Helsingfors. It's been longjumping since last night: last pid: 20440; load averages: 1.09, 1.13, 1.09 =20 up 12+21:24:00 08:57:17 140 processes: 2 running, 138 sleeping CPU states: 19.1% user, 0.0% nice, 33.5% system, 0.0% interrupt, 47.4% id= le Mem: 463M Active, 1213M Inact, 220M Wired, 104M Cache, 112M Buf, 7320K Free Swap: 4096M Total, 992K Used, 4095M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 18858 claus 1 115 0 2368K 1056K CPU1 1 631:52 99.02% longjmp 57798 claus 1 96 0 150M 148M select 0 48:48 0.54% Xorg Did a gmake and started the benchmark without any parameters. Nice work moving it to FreeBSD. regards Claus