From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 20 15:19:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A2E37B417 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA27898; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:19:03 +1100 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:19:13 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Steve Kargl Cc: Subject: Re: Removing CSRG libm? In-Reply-To: <20020316185844.A55727@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Message-ID: <20020321101340.X11932-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Steve Kargl wrote: > A long time ago I submitted PR misc/17848 which > removes CSRG libm sources. The audit trail shows > some commentary, but AFAICT nothing much has been > done based on that commentary. With the upcoming > release of of 5.0, I think we should consider the > removal od CSRG libm and the repo copying of msun > to libm; otherwise we'll drag CSRG libm around > until 6.0. OK, I will remove libm after repo-copying the interesting parts of it to libm. I'm not sure about repo-copying msun back to libm. It would would only create a small mess because they have only one file in common (the top-level Makefile). In general, repo-copying back can't be done without creating a large mess, because copying would clobber all the old history. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message