Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:04:03 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need feedback/review, a big change in AbiWord2 port. Message-ID: <1086750243.28195.45.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <opr9a070v19aq2h7@mezz> References: <opr89h2ul39aq2h7@mezz> <20040608175318.GY72578@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr9ag46nu9aq2h7@mezz> <20040608185934.GB72578@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr9aicro99aq2h7@mezz> <20040609003811.GC72578@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr9a070v19aq2h7@mezz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-Poc1snd05ikPlEQIRdIf
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 22:01, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:38:11 -0400, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> =20
> wrote:
>=20
> >>> (06.08.2004 @ 1513 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 3.8K: <<
> >> >>>> - Change the default spell from Enchant to Aspell, because it =20
> >> doesn't
> >> >>>> work at all unless you compile Enchant with the Aspell support.=
I
> >> >>>> think, it's waste to depend on Enchant by default.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also, I have removed the check of Enchant. I prefer to see forc=
e
> >> >>>> user to want use Enchant if they know what to do with it. I nee=
d
> >> >>>> the
> >> >>>> help on write the better comment in @${ECHO_CMD} about this.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I disagree strongly with this. I think that Enchant is a great idea=
.
> >> >>>Enchant isn't being utilized properly ATM, but it has the propensit=
y =20
> >> to
> >> >>>be a great leap forward in i18n spell-checking.
> >> >>
> >> >>What's your best suggest then? Force Enchant to compile with Aspell
> >> >>support? This is the way that I will allow Enchant to be default. It
> >> >>doesn't make any sense to have something that will not work by =20
> >> default.
> >> >>I
> >> >>think, it's important to have the default that is just work.
> >> >
> >> >Enchant should theoretically work fine without aspell support. But, I
> >> >think that Enchant should be enabled by defaultm, and should work
> >> >out-of-the-box, by whatever means necessary.
> >>
> >> Do you mean, you think we should change Enchant port to compile with
> >> Aspell support? If no, then I will not switch Aspell to Enchant for th=
e
> >> default spell, unless you have anything to fix it.
> >>> end of "Re: Need feedback/review, a big change in AbiWord2 port." fro=
m =20
> >>> Jeremy Messenger <<
> >
> > Yes. If Enchant needs aspell support for AbiWord2 to work best, then
> > Enchant should depend upon aspell by default.
>=20
> With those diffs, now the spell works by default with Enchant. No object =
=20
> tonight and I will commit those by tomorrow. Thanks for review/feedback, =
=20
> marcus and adamw!
>=20
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/enchant.diff
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/AbiWord2.diff
These look fine. Thanks!
Joe
>=20
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>=20
> > # Adam
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adam Weinberger
> > adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
> > adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org
> > http://www.vectors.cx
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
--=-Poc1snd05ikPlEQIRdIf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBAxn4jb2iPiv4Uz4cRAp8EAJ9A20m50b+QpBm6AmerjSJOcM6QLgCfehsf
4xNridU9bq6riBbmlrchKBM=
=A8NB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Poc1snd05ikPlEQIRdIf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1086750243.28195.45.camel>