From owner-freebsd-libh Fri Dec 13 13:58:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E6D37B401 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from aeimail.aei.ca (aeimail.aei.ca [206.123.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC6543EDC for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:58:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx) Received: from shall.anarcat.ath.cx (ialiw64v8i6lsf8x@dsl-134-52.aei.ca [66.36.134.52]) by aeimail.aei.ca (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id gBDLwAK06224; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:58:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from lenny.anarcat.ath.cx (lenny.anarcat.ath.cx [192.168.0.4]) by shall.anarcat.ath.cx (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D0C941C; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:57:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by lenny.anarcat.ath.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:57:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:57:59 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Max Okumoto Cc: Alexander Langer , libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: libh Makefile.bm Makefile.new find_classes_descriptions.pl libh/bin module.m4 libh/bin/HuiQt_shared module.m4 libh/bin/HuiQt_static module.m4 libh/bin/HuiTvTest main.cc module.m4 libh/bin/HuiTv_shared ... Message-ID: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <200212121309.gBCD9DN0065656@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> <20021212231208.GE76886@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20021213004457.GB616@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ahh.. I understand now. I totally agree about the tag issue. I got a bit over my head here, and I didn't realize you can remove tags from the tree. You were totally right in using those tags, please accept my apologies.=20 I think that yes, the HACKERS file would be a good place to store doc about the tags. I'll try to find time to revert the changes to my backup tonight, and I'll send you an email as soon as I do it. However, we have still not resolved the thing about the mail being sent as the libh user. I'll have to figure that one out. I think it's because you (max) don't have a *real* user account on rtp.freebsd.org, only an entry in the password file, but I thought it would have been the same. Obviously it isn't. Again, please all accept my apologies for panicing like this. I'm glad to see you back, Max. Sorry we started on the wrong track. :) A. On Fri Dec 13, 2002 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Max Okumoto wrote: >=20 > I had stuff that was not check in just before the > crash of usw4.freebsd.org. And I kept working > and assumed that the cvs tree would come backup > soon. > o Cleaned up more of the Hui GUI/TUI stuff=20 > o Made the Hui code compile with gcc32 > o put some namespace stuff for std:: in to the code. > o Have a partial patch for tvision which allows > me to compile... but linking needs a few more > things. >=20 > Then the wedding happened... started a new job... >=20 > I am ok with reverting to a image before the last check in. Those > $Id$ really should not be in there. >=20 > I will try an redo the check in in smaller groups. >=20 > About the tag issue. I think tags are really usefull for keeping > repositories stable. If for instance we didn't have the backups > that you have it would be possible to revert all my changes via > the tag. >=20 > Tags are easy to create, and easy to remove. There is no significant > overhead for checkins or checkouts. > % cvs tag -d XXXX will remove the tag. >=20 > One thing that would prob help is if I put into the hackers file > a descriptition of what the tag represented. >=20 > If you want I can remove the tags that I have put in. >=20 >=20 > Max Okumoto >=20 > The Anarcat writes: >=20 > > Ok. Don't worry Max, we'll get over it. > >=20 > > Heck, I've seen much worse! :) > >=20 > > Max, you are actually saying that the repo that was put on > > rtp.freebsd.org originally didn't match the one that was left on > > usw4.freebsd.org? > >=20 > > Or did you continue working on usw4 without telling us? ;) > >=20 > > At any rate, *what* were those changes? Needless to say I sure don't > > want to go through all the diffs to see what changed. > >=20 > > As I said off-list, I'd prefer to revert the changes with a backup I > > have here than to complicate the matter by playing even more with tags > > and branches. > >=20 > > What do you guys think? > >=20 > > A. > >=20 > > On Thu Dec 12, 2002 at 04:09:07PM -0800, Max Okumoto wrote: > > >=20 > > > The original cvs repo that was on usw4.freebsd.org before > > > it was on rtp.FreeBSD.Org. I had work that was not checked. > > > After I merged in all the changes from the current CVS repo > > > I check in that work... but the rcs $Id$ stuff wasn't processed > > > correctly. And thus this huge message. If you look at it most > > > of the changes are 2+ 2-. > > >=20 > > > Sigh.. I wanted to slowly get back into working on libh, but > > > it seams that instead of a quiet entry it was a huge crash. > > >=20 > > > If you want to see the changes you can check via > > > % cvs diff -rBM_4 -rBM_5 > > >=20 > > > There are two tags; BM_4 before my checkin and BM_5 after my > > > check in. > > >=20 > > > Max Okumoto > > >=20 > > > Alexander Langer writes: > > >=20 > > > > > Check in all the changes since the previous CVS server crashed. > > > >=20 > > > > What? Which prev. CVS Server? When did it crash?? > > > >=20 > > > > Does this mean we lost the history? > > > >=20 > > > > Alex > > > >=20 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message > > >=20 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message > > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > > Premature optimization is the root of all evil > > - Donald Knuth >=20 --=20 Premature optimization is the root of all evil - Donald Knuth --uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9+lfmttcWHAnWiGcRAlUXAJ9BcHIvtpxX4KqzkM+ELZV2Qd8sTwCeNeY7 wb/EDhCMXxfCUgzLka7GB5M= =PP10 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uXxzq0nDebZQVNAZ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message