From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 14 06:05:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA22931 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 06:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA22924 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 06:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with SMTP id OAA06558 ; Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:03:24 +0100 (BST) To: sameer@c2.org cc: brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com (Brandon Gillespie), questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: FreeBSD as DNS In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 Apr 1996 04:01:08 PDT." <199604141101.EAA29021@atropos.c2.org> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:03:24 +0100 Message-ID: <6556.829487004@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk sameer@c2.org wrote in message ID <199604141101.EAA29021@atropos.c2.org>: > > Yes, try apache; I've used both and frankly I dont see a reason to use > > Netscape's server when you can use Apache. If you want the secure end > > you can pay for it (at about 1/3 what it would cost to get netscape) from > > various people who have extended apache. > uh, please don't call Stronghold: The Apache-SSL-US a "secure > server". It does SSL. It doesn't fix sendmail. Sorry???? What on earth does SSL capable WWW servers have to do with sendmail? They are two COMPLETELY different topics... Do you have a grudge against sendmail or something? Gary