From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 23 13:55:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5FB395 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CE41100 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n7so2447355qcx.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=EgKAQxsESX76OM7kSah10O6CnyxkJdfGo2RMf5v5TIY=; b=x4/1cFqlQuwt/fFsUcDf4fzdP7npmsV1bSVyb2MjQRhDm3wdHdxTmLK1BfJrXjYPB+ MN8yrtcWvpFtjOyCxuJ/sBDeqt5bmsPPlq4uE5Mbr1EI1e5xQFhoLdpPBHC187m8rrzv M6sV7KtsHq7wuMwWhi1pYfpX0XKWRRBYos3b2W5TvLRGKe+UOW/o1pO3qsVwzddKTnQB Okz+m4pm0z9zIEC4Vt+s/OJag0vsiX+miyhgdeBKCa0r4kkCN4Ij6nQhyNZs8F2q6vdk aqx7y1wWkIuld81H4+zbRDF4eQMVlTEv6ahQP3X2K6PAN6M8PJHDNVtsuGMkkFuCuztw S1yQ== X-Received: by 10.140.38.168 with SMTP id t37mr10863741qgt.33.1390485323438; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumiwa.farms.net ([71.241.213.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ep10sm1433423qeb.17.2014.01.23.05.55.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:22 -0800 (PST) From: Ajtim To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmanager vs portupgrade Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 08:55:20 -0500 Message-ID: <10272177.k8s2pG1s4i@lumiwa.farms.net> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.4 (FreeBSD/10.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.11.4; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140123130817.7c75dc70@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <52E0FE75.9010504@webrz.net> <52E10D9F.7050003@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20140123130817.7c75dc70@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: RW X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:55:24 -0000 On Thursday 23 January 2014 13:08:17 RW wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:39:59 +0000 > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > maintained by the same people (bdrewery mostly). portupgrade requires > > you to install ruby as well: that's probably the biggest deciding > > factor still extant. > > For me the biggest factor is that portupgrade doesn't stop on the first > error, it carries on building ports that don't depend on failed ports > and then presents a summary of the problems at the end. > > This is a big advantage on desktop installations where there are a lot > more ports and they are generally less reliable. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I am portmaster user from FreeBSD 7.0 and I want to switch to portupgrade. Should I expected some problems becaue everything is install with portmaster? Thank you. -- Mitja ------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa