From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Feb  6 17:45:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA21838
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:45:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21813
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:45:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA19568
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:17:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id BAA05796; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 01:17:21 GMT
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 10:17:21 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: How paranoid is Theo? (was Re: Karl fulminates, film at 11. == , thanks) 
In-Reply-To: <E0vsen0-0007NJ-00@rover.village.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970207101328.5763A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 6 Feb 1997, Warner Losh wrote:

> In message <Pine.SV4.3.95.970207094754.5515B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> Michael Hancock writes:
> : With the stuff you've looked at so far does it look like Theo is going
> : after each and every buffer overflow possibility or the just the ones that
> : can be exploited?
> 
> Mostly just exploitable or likely exploitable ones.
> 
> Warner

Cool.  You can establish a contract of trust between called functions and
calling functions and not waste time fixing things that aren't
exploitable.

Mike Hancock