From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jan 8 6:29:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4070237B417 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g08ETDA86606; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:29:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20.cicely.de [10.1.1.22]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g08ESotx099333; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:28:51 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g08ESoW22748; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:28:50 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g08ESnr24630; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:28:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:28:49 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What could be wrong? very slow networking box Message-ID: <20020108152849.A24367@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <004401c195fe$18378c90$9600000a@tamama> <20020105175108.A15190@cicely8.cicely.de> <20020105190829.A65181@freebie.xs4all.nl> <044e01c1984a$a1ce7ab0$1900a8c0@pc48> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <044e01c1984a$a1ce7ab0$1900a8c0@pc48> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely8.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote: > Hoi, > > Well I guess it's just a slow box then. Still doesnt feel right that it > can not route 7kb/sec (+- 200 udp packets) speedy enough not to notice Well routing packets/sec != ping != delay. > there is a gateway in between. It's not a strange thing that it is not > acting as my gateway at this point. You wrote that you are using nat. It's no problem for me to saturate a 10Mbit LAN with a NoName, but without nat and without routing with the box. But you seem to have cache RAM installed, which I don't. I never got mine stable with cache installed :( Yes it's a slow box - even with Cache. It's a low cost board build in 1994. > Oh well I'll just try to get this linux emulation working and see if > that Compaq compiler will do any good on it.. If not then I have a good > box to test both running-speed and portability of my applications on :-) ccc bring you good speed improvements - especialy on non-BWX machines. It would be good to see our port supporting the C++ capable versions, but I don't had the time and experience to update the port myself. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message