From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 9 22:17:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA71ED68 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802218FC14 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC36CA863 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:17:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A4E2CEC00 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:17:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:17:23 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: future of packages? Message-ID: <20121010001723.0e75efb2@davenulle.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:17:49 -0000 Hello, I have to say that I'm convinced that pkg and packages is the way to go. It is nice to have a package manager (pkg is a wonderfull tool), but without package, such tool is a bit useless... So which packages? IMO packages should be consistent (by example if we support ipv6, all packages should have "ipv6 on" option). But this is also true for, by example ldap: should we provide ldap authentifcation by default? (IMO yes since FreeBSD targets servers). A "generic" packages set also means that a lot of things (into packages) will be useless (I'm sure some pleople will complain). But it will be the cost to use packages. IMO it will take a lot a time to have a consistent options set for our packages. It could be a bit premature, but I will be to happy to ear about how packages and packages options will be handle in the future. Regards.