From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 14:43:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4F1106564A for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofx-freebsd-xen@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FC88FC08 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofx-freebsd-xen@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ4gg-0002D1-IY for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:10 +0000 Received: from 217-68-187-100.dynamic.primacom.net ([217.68.187.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:10 +0000 Received: from js by 217-68-187-100.dynamic.primacom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:10 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org From: Julian Stecklina Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:42:58 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <87skmeqw7h.fsf@tabernacle.lan> References: <877i4d1p46.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> <1233285639.24925.12.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> <87ljsokbdn.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> <3c1674c90902042004x299bee3ay7a231a27252e7e55@mail.gmail.com> <8763joeuzz.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> <1233863896.22204.46.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net> <3c1674c90902051203n338be726rc18ab1f71c513d6c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217-68-187-100.dynamic.primacom.net X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: Gnus/5.101 (Gnus v5.10.10) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dUfDDtecuD0tPNAf10MOQpFsQL0= Sender: news Subject: Re: Time goes backwards X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:13 -0000 Kip Macy writes: > I will take a closer look. This is clearly a separate issue from the > loss of timer interrupts - I had assumed that they were related. I've seen that you made some changes to the timer code. Is this related to this issue? Btw, VMWare didn't cut it either in building a virtual Xen test box. *bummer* Regards, -- Julian Stecklina Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C, so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)