From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 12 23:34:24 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA04930
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 23:34:24 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA04924
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 23:34:22 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id XAA14655; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 23:34:14 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA00272; Wed, 12 Apr 1995 23:34:12 -0700
Message-Id: <199504130634.XAA00272@corbin.Root.COM>
To: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: SLIP bug ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Apr 95 16:17:48 CDT."
             <199504122117.QAA00323@hq.icb.chel.su> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 23:34:12 -0700
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>I  have found a little bug in SLIP (950210-SNAP). Comment says that SLIP
>must mask both network and tty interrupts by spl...(), but really
>it masks splimp() only. Is this error corrected in -current ? If not
>I can submit a diff.

   It is not a bug. When SLIP is configured, splimp |= spltty.

-DG