Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:11:31 +0100
From:      Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>
To:        Yamamoto Shigeru <shigeru@iij.ad.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: new ath+hal
Message-ID:  <1140171091.816.8.camel@genius.i.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20060217.122420.38719049.shigeru@iij.ad.jp>
References:  <43F0C10E.305@errno.com> <20060216.120239.102583278.shigeru@iij.ad.jp> <43F3FAF3.7010000@errno.com> <20060217.122420.38719049.shigeru@iij.ad.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yamamoto Shigeru wrote:
> >>>>> "Sam" == Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> writes:
> >> Does anyone know how to solve this trouble?
> >> #Should I hack wpa_supplicant? or ath hal and driver?
> Sam> There have been many changes to ath and the net80211 layer.  Please try
> Sam> to isolate what change affected you.  Past that you must provide the
> Sam> mac+phy revs for your card.  Otherwise you have not indicated anything
> Sam> about your configuration (open auth, wep, wpa, etc).  You haven't
> Sam> provided any logs.
> 
> Excuse me.
> I write my environment.
> 
> - IBM ThinkPad X31
> - kernel and user land is current at 2006/02/16
> - ath_hal: 0.9.16.16 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413)
> - ath0: mac 5.6 phy 4.1 5ghz radio 1.7 2ghz radio 2.3
> - Access Point is 'I/O DATA WN-APG/A" (http://www.iodata.jp/prod/network/wnlan/2004/wn-apga/index.htm)
> -- 'bssid 00:a0:b0:5e:73:b1' for 11b
> -- 'bssid 00:a0:b0:5e:73:b2' for 11a
> -- accept WPA-PSK only (not accept WEP)

Just a small observation - when I recently tried WPA-PSK and had both
wpa_supplicant and hostapd running in the foreground with debugging
enabled the station didn't associate. It worked without changing the
configuration when I run both without debugging. I didn't have time to
analyze it.

I remember that Sam once mentioned that Windows stations are unable to
associate with FreeBSD AP when hostapd is run in debug mode, because
debug made the AP's timing less precise or something. Maybe the last
changes make the FreeBSD station also less tolerant?

Michal




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1140171091.816.8.camel>