From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Dec 6 19:29:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B371CE89EEE for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [52.11.127.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9861E7F852 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan-lists@shatow.net) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41157260A; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:29:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id f3QmK5jSPPg6; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Question about poudriere "queued" ports? DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com DA8202605 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=shatow.net; s=mxc204805312015; t=1512588540; bh=mPAb3u9fMPO5tmB5Anr0gy7ljxqoUw2AOqagZsdwP3A=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CVsUgW4fyZNVILRqKMiLMmh4uNHj/nOayymT6MeM4ze07ecpcDKHRr/GBvqwwYH1H RJh/6q8T0Z948u6DVCyW2QUxkPneJxJZ117YyX3RIGSr1ZqzbQP8ZBpOWkGHmE8T66 rYeU7A/Qoug3Cx16HtwHVPD9ikMuh2A0A/p6pwNJJkohUXn7O0hctx9D+gKdZ2pEVq cdDXToidxs3VTJwBONCzjFi8Rv6h5tXmdjlJFAa2uCbGv2kAu4LJNogpboiK7BzZct 8zh/bAbAMsEVJ+s4rMIuUq2182zXKVwaanDaAsVLGSgvoCbihbC2zgrj5Inv6niup+ DBw7cs6hSXNXA== To: rainer@ultra-secure.de, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org References: <27a8c236-1fc4-aacd-1274-00fb839b843c@FreeBSD.org> <67ebdf3d6e3956c61eac38eac1aa795e@ultra-secure.de> From: Bryan Drewery Message-ID: <7aed4a65-f6ab-e179-9e1f-abd672e39b02@shatow.net> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:29:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <67ebdf3d6e3956c61eac38eac1aa795e@ultra-secure.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:29:04 -0000 On 12/6/2017 2:17 AM, rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote: > Am 2017-12-06 10:55, schrieb Matthew Seaman: >> On 05/12/2017 20:47, rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote: >>> after updating poudriere, I get a lot of ports showing up in the "Queued >>> ports" section, with the reason being "listed". >>> >>> >>> What does that mean? >> >> 'Queued ports' is the list of packages poudriere has calculated should >> be in the repository.  Those given as 'listed' are the ones you've >> specifically told poudriere to build -- you should also see build- and >> run- time dependencies of those ports.  I think the ordering is >> significant (BICBW) -- it shows what order poudriere will try and build >> packages, although this is complicated by some packages taking ages to >> build and holding up everything else that depends on them (llvm40, >> openjdk8 are frequently this sort of culprit.) >> >> This is not the list of packages that poudriere will actually be >> rebuilding, unless you're doing a 'poudriere bulk -c' to rebuild >> everything from scratch.  The list is filtered to pull out any packages >> where an update is available, plus anything that depends on the >> updatable package. > > > OK, but it doesn't build those "queued" packages. > > The build-run ends and they just stay as "listed". > > I just want it to build everything like it used to do ;-) > I knew this feature would be confusing. The Queued table is literally what was queued to build initially (after filtering out unneeded packages). It is the full list of packages Poudriere is trying to build. It is *not* a "Remaining" or "Still" Queued list. It is an _Initially_ Queued list. You can see the *Remaining* ports to build by adding HTML_TRACK_REMAINING=yes to poudriere.conf but it can incur a performance hit which is why it is off by default currently until I can improve it. The Queued list is merely informational. It has no impact on functionality. Poudriere is still "building everything like it used to do". -- Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet