From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 23 12:43:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5E1106566B for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allicient3141@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD80B8FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so5712640vws.13 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:43:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HD/nAvZFrBXX2c2SwbVjVuq5cqgrh6NHhAcgD1DeAYw=; b=tN6gLlL4jA2liuRnqiLwvOj5/1VToLwxPofP/jAbFtNDg9scnVHoeWPDfO/ij8UMjI qOMpFoul1/BnpsoD0yycmLhOiG/ZHVrmZqrY09L71rITMEFaQZ5Gd2xDYJSfOjMSl89l xSVyOaqhUujk3BZaDYCfl9FJUWkPX6uakF0hk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.113.67 with SMTP id iw3mr19345667vdb.121.1319372046082; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: allicient3141@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.108.136 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:14:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ea18916.IBAr0lF5RCzEYn6G%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4ea18916.IBAr0lF5RCzEYn6G%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:14:06 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1RWQ8V5Q6asKhLK5XOzlR016Dnw Message-ID: From: Peter Maxwell To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1 xl + dual-speed Netgear hub = yoyo X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:43:59 -0000 On 21 October 2011 16:00, wrote: > > ...snip... > > Both connections were using the same (short) Cat5 cable, I tried two > different ports on the 10/100 hub, and other systems work OK on that > 10/100 hub. > > How do I get this interface to operate properly at 100MB? > > ...snip... "Auto-negotiation" is a nightmare, and *will* cause you problems. The best you can do is try to try to set every device using the switch to 100Mbps full, if that doesn't work buy a proper switch.